Whether it is a Canadian progressive crossing the border to physically attack children over political attire, or our Prime Minister ignoring Washington to talk trash to global elites, the pattern is identical. Leftists raised in the Canadian echo chamber genuinely believe their self-righteousness exempts them from consequences. But the moment they step outside our catch-and-release borders, they get hit by a brutal dose of reality.

Let’s look directly at the wreckage.

FAFO on the Boardwalk: The Arrest of Kaitlyn Tracey

Our first story is a textbook case of “F*** Around and Find Out” (FAFO). Last week, news broke of a 33-year-old Canadian woman, Kaitlyn Tracy, who was arrested by New Jersey police after launching a politically motivated physical assault on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk.

Tracy reportedly approached a group of teenagers, pulled out her phone to film them, and began screaming because a teenage girl in the group was wearing sweatpants with the words “Trump” and “ICE.” Tracey then slapped the minor across the face and body. Thanks to local surveillance footage, New Jersey police tracked her down and hit her with heavy charges: simple assault, harassment, obstruction, and endangering the welfare of a child.

Because Tracey is a Canadian citizen who entered the U.S. on a tourist passport, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) immediately intervened. Her American husband posted a tearful video breakdown online, weeping that his wife was transferred to a Newark detention centre. He pleaded for an immigration lawyer, admitting he is ready to have her deported back to Canada just to get her out of custody.

In Canada, our progressive state tolerates and excuses ideological violence. But when you cross into a sovereign jurisdiction that actually respects law enforcement, you don’t get released on bail based on your political opinions. You go directly to a cell.

The Davos Fantasy Meets the Pentagon Hammer

While Kaitlyn Tracey was discovering that American laws are real, Prime Minister Mark Carney was receiving the exact same lesson on the macroeconomic stage.

Instead of negotiating our vital CUSMA trade deal in good faith, Carney spent his winter at Davos delivering a pompous “Middle Powers Unite” speech. He urged globalists to bypass the United States, calling the “America First” posture a “rupture in the rules-based order”.

This week, the Trump administration officially lost its patience. In a series of devastating public statements, U.S. Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby explicitly incinerated Carney’s entire foreign policy:

“There is a great deal of hubbub about a collective ‘middle powers’ strategy these days... At [the Department of War], we are more concerned that a few allies and partners will think it is and waste valuable time, money, and political capital on a distraction.” — Under Secretary Elbridge Colby

Colby reminded Canada that access to the U.S. defense industrial base is “a privilege, not a right,” and ridiculed the idea of a middle-power bloc as a fantasy lacking any coherent alignment.

Submarines, Soros, and the Nova Scotia Retreat

Carney’s anti-American spite is actively compromising our national security. Rather than buying premier U.S. F-35s or securing a massive $4.5 billion domestic industrial injection via a Korean submarine deal, Carney’s cabinet chose Swedish Gripens and a German submarine contract. Why? Because the German conglomerate’s affiliate promised to fund a massive carbon capture project in Alberta—a sector Carney is heavily invested in.

To make matters worse, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly was spotted this week at the ultra-exclusive Fox Harb’r Resort in Nova Scotia, hosting none other than progressive billionaire Alex Soros. This is Soros’s second quiet Canadian meeting in four months. “Middle powers unite” is nothing more than code for progressive billionaires funding a backroom movement to subvert North American populism.

The Bottom Line

Whether it is an activist on a New Jersey boardwalk or a central banker at Davos, the ruling progressive class is discovering that their moral entitlement does not shield them from reality.

View the full episode here:

The Cochrane Gaslight and the Elite Victim Complex

Appearing on CBC’s Power & Politics, Majumdar went toe-to-toe with host David Cochrane. Cochrane immediately tried to deploy the classic establishment script, framing Donald Trump and the U.S. administration as the sole source of international trade chaos. Cochrane even pointed to domestic U.S. court dramas as “proof” that Washington is simply an impossible partner to deal with.

But Majumdar—drawing on his extensive national security background as a former foreign policy advisor to Stephen Harper and John Baird—refused to take the bait. He bluntly exposed Canada’s trade failure as a direct consequence of our own gutless foreign policy. For a decade, Ottawa has treated national security as a joke, allowing Beijing to weaponize trade and systematically infiltrate our continental supply chains. Now that Washington is demanding strict perimeter security, our government is acting shocked that the “free-rider” era is over. By allowing Mexico to take the lead in Washington while our chair remained empty, the Carney administration has effectively let our partners dictate the future of CUSMA (USMCA).

Dillydallying into Defeat: The Evidence

Cochrane, desperate to defend the status quo, demanded to know: “What evidence is there that Canada is the problem here?” Majumdar’s response was a precise, devastating indictment of the Liberal-technocrat cabinet. While our elite class acts surprised by America’s assertiveness, our allies see a nation that refuses to carry its own weight on the global stage.

The forced labor issue is the ultimate smoking gun. While Mexico and Peru sent high-level, serious delegations to Washington to secure their supply chains, Canada’s presence was a complete embarrassment. We barely managed to submit a lazy, incomplete written note. Instead of showing up to the table, Carney’s cabinet ministers visit Beijing to coordinate with the CCP rather than lobbying in Houston, Los Angeles, New York, or Florida. We have completely surrendered our trade leverage because our leaders are more interested in getting rich off the green grift than securing the jobs of industrial workers.

The Blue Blueprint: Autopact 2.0 and Hard Power

Instead of hiding behind bureaucratic excuses and mourning our decline, Majumdar laid out the concrete, alternative being offered by Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives to rebuild our national leverage from a position of absolute strength. If we want Washington to treat us as a serious partner, we must act like one.

The Conservative blueprint is rooted in hard power and economic independence:

• Autopact 2.0: Revitalizing and deeply integrating our automotive manufacturing sector directly with the United States to safeguard North American workers.

• A Critical Minerals Strategic Preserve: Establishing a NATO-grade strategic reserve of Canadian critical minerals to guarantee continental resource and energy security.

• Unlocking Energy Infrastructure: Instantly repealing the anti-pipeline, anti-shipping, and anti-development regulations holding our economy hostage.

• Axing the Industrial Carbon Tax: Removing the regulatory deadweight to make trillions of dollars in Canadian resources shovel-ready within six months.

• Advancing our Defense Industrial Base: Transforming Canada into a premier, hard-power producer to resolve the free world’s massive munitions shortages.

The Bottom Line

The path forward is transparent. We can continue to let Mark Carney play radio silence with the White House while his cabinet prioritizes Beijing over our own backyard, or we can embrace a hard-nosed, pro-worker strategy that treats national security and resource development as our ultimate leverage.

View the full episode below:

Martell gets to skip the grind of knocking on doors, stop worrying about voters, and sit pretty on a taxpayer-funded base salary of $185,000 a year until he turns 75. But this isn’t just a career move for a tired politician—it is a calculated, deeply cynical chess move by Mark Carney to systematically engineer an illegitimate federal majority.

The Death of Non-Partisanship and the Insider Sweepstakes

To pull off this flagrant political poaching, Carney had to quietly dismantle the last remaining illusion of parliamentary checks and balances. Tuesday morning, the PMO officially announced that Carney has unilaterally waived the non-partisan Senate selection criteria—a framework originally established back in 2016.

While that advisory board was always a bit of a meritocracy façade, it at least forced the executive branch to simulate transparency. By shredding it, Carney has sent a clear message: the mask is off. He now operates by absolute fiat, appointing nakedly partisan actors and cronies directly from his inner circle.

Alongside Martell, Carney filled the vacancies with three loyalists expected to play the role of “independents”:

• Tom Pitfield: Carney’s literal Principal Secretary and core backroom architect.

• Dr. Rodney Ouellette: A New Brunswick institutional insider.

• Gita Tucker: A compliant corporate executive out of Manitoba.

The Math of Corruption: Poaching Chicoutimi—Le Fjord

Why would Carney give a luxury Senate seat to a Conservative? It’s all about the data. Martell’s riding of Chicoutimi—Le Fjord is a fragile three-way toss-up. In the 2025 election, Martell barely held on with 34% of the vote, while the Liberals and the Bloc Québécois sat right on his heels at 31% each.

Carney knows his federal numbers are sliding in Quebec, and he is desperate for compliant bodies in the House. By buying Martell out of the equation, Carney forces a strategic by-election in a riding his team believes they can take. This perfectly mirrors the sickening floor-crossing of Marilyn Gladu, who openly admitted in an interview that she defected to the Liberals in exchange for riding infrastructure funds. It is highest-level corruption, completely ignored by a handcuffed RCMP and celebrated by a compliant media as “masterful negotiation.”

“The world is changing rapidly... [This] requires focused representatives... and removing the non-partisanship criterion.” — Official PMO Statement

They are literally peeing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. This is authoritarianism disguised as institutional modernization.

The Bottom Line

The federal opposition is currently in a state of public disarray, distracted by internal squabbling and media-driven side-shows. But we cannot afford to treat this as a spectator sport. Carney will never voluntarily call a general election; he intends to manufacture his majority piece by piece through coerced floor-crossings and targeted by-elections before November.

The only way to shatter the Carney narrative is raw, ground-level mobilization. If common-sense Canadians organize, show up, and hold the line in these upcoming summer by-elections—and take back ridings like Jonathan Wilkinson’s in B.C.—it sends an undeniable message to the establishment that we will not be managed into decline.

Watch the full episode here:

If you are feeling checked out, I am here to tell you that it is entirely by design. This is not an accidental byproduct of the modern internet. It is a calculated, coordinated strategy to overwhelm your system, exhaust your critical thinking, and force you to disengage from the democratic process so that the ruling elite can avoid accountability. Let’s expose a resurfaced admission from Prime Minister Mark Carney detailing how he co-opted this exact psychological playbook, the three critical failures it is hiding, and how we must adjust our defence to fight back.

The Resurfaced Admission: Copying the Bannon Playbook

A damning interview has resurfaced from a Bloomberg podcast recorded roughly eight months ago, laying bare the exact media strategy Mark Carney uses to govern. When asked directly on the international stage if he admired or learned anything from Donald Trump, Carney delivered a highly revealing answer:

Carney’s Words: “I’ve learned lots of things from President Trump... I don’t fully subscribe to this, but I see the effectiveness, the value of the term they would use is ‘flooding the zone’—of doing multiple things at the same time and the effectiveness that can have... of dominating the agenda.”

Let’s be entirely clear about where that terminology comes from. “Flooding the zone” is a media manipulation strategy explicitly coined by Steve Bannon. The goal is simple: deliberately saturate the media landscape with an unceasing torrent of announcements, micro-stories, and manufactured narratives. By keeping the news cycle moving at terminal velocity, a government can successfully minimize the lifespans of negative headlines before they stick and cause permanent political damage.

We saw this called out as early as September 2025 in a brilliant piece by Darrell Bricker for The Hub, titled “Ottawa floods the zone as the economy treads water.” Bricker documented an endless stream of photo-ops, ribbon-cuttings, and empty international air miles all designed to mask a grim economic collapse. Carney is weaponizing Trump’s media playbook against the Canadian public to protect the globalist status quo.

The Three Critical Realities Being Buried

When everyday Canadians ask me how people keep falling for this administrative illusion, my answer is always the same: they are simply exhausted. Regular people have lives to live, families to feed, and businesses to run. When the state systematically floods the zone, it burns out your psychological pleasure centres, making you want to tune out entirely.

If we strip away the synthetic fluff of the last few weeks, there are three critical, foundational failures that Carney is desperately trying to prevent you from focusing on for more than 48 hours:

Economic Flatline: Deloitte Canada confirmed that our national economy has ground to a close halt, projecting a pathetic 0.7% growth rate for the entire year.

The Inflation Spike: Statistics Canada revealed that annual inflation has surged right back up to 3.2%, continuing to erode your purchasing power.

The Trade Failure: We are past the critical CUSMA deadline, and Mexico openly progresses on bilateral talks with the US.

Anatomy of an Eight-Day Blitz

To understand how effectively Carney executes this Trump-style strategy, look at the rapid-fire succession of distractions deployed to bury the catastrophic news of the United States walking away from CUSMA.

Within a mere 11-day window leading up to the trade deadline, the government hit the wire with the controversial Bill C-34 censorship bill, immediately followed it with a massive Vancouver condo bailout, and seamlessly transitioned into a high-profile visit from the Croatian Prime Minister—where Carney was caught on a hot mic admitting he views MPs as chess pieces only “useful for votes.”

Then, the moment the public began pushing back on his hot-mic arrogance, the PMO executed an intense, eight-day blitz containing four entirely artificial stories:

1. A sudden Arctic security call with Donald Trump.

2. An emergency announcement regarding the multi-million-dollar reconstruction of 24 Sussex Drive.

3. A heavily produced Canada Day “national unity” marketing campaign.

4. Continuous legacy media praise for the bilateral Croatian trade chatter.

Every single one of these stories was strategically engineered to fill airtime, saturate social media algorithms, and completely avoid any public discussion regarding our current trade tension with the US.

The Bottom Line

The new media has a responsibility to stop falling into this trap. In our effort to keep you constantly updated, independent outlets frequently play right into Carney’s hands by chasing every single shiny object his communications team throws into the arena.

Moving forward, The Elevate Report is changing its defensive posture. We are completely ignoring the establishment fluff. If a story does not directly impact Affordability, Immigration, or National Security, we are tuning it out. If the data points on those three pillars aren’t improving, the rest is just administrative noise.

We are tracking some genuine, consequential news breaking this afternoon regarding a major Alberta pipeline to the coast that could actually build real wealth for this country, and we will bring you those hard metrics the moment they are verified. Take a break when you need to recharge, but do not let them win by tuning out completely.

Watch the full episode here:

We are staring down the exact economic death by a thousand paper cuts that we have been warning about for over a year, and Mark Carney has watched it all collapse without lifting a single finger to save Canadian workers.

The Ten-Year Limbo: Why the “Sunset” Spin is an Investment Killer

Let’s look directly at the cold, hard facts of the Reuters disclosure. On Wednesday, July 1, 2026—the long-awaited treaty review deadline—the Trump administration is expected to formally declare that the United States will not extend the North American free trade zone. This declaration instantly triggers a mandatory six-year review session under the sunset clause negotiated during Trump’s first term. If the three nations fail to agree on sweeping revisions to block Chinese backdoor circumvention and radically boost domestic content requirements, a decade-long clock begins to wind down. Without a unanimous trilateral renewal, the continental trade pact will officially expire on July 1, 2036.

Now, the moment this news hits the airwaves tonight, the legacy media and Liberal apologists are going to launch into a full-blown gaslighting bonanza. They are going to smile and tell you, “Don’t panic, everything is fine, we still have ten whole years of free trade intact!”

Do not fall for it. In the macro-world of large-scale manufacturing and global capital, a ten-year countdown is an absolute death sentence for business investment. Everyday individuals plan their lives in three-to-five-year increments—saving for a house, a vacation, or retirement.

But when multi-billion-dollar corporations look to build massive automotive factories, supply-chain hubs, or industrial infrastructure, they calculate their capital deployment across 15, 20, 25, and 30-year horizons.

If an international board of directors sees that Canada’s free-trade access to its largest consumer market is trapped in a year-to-year political limbo with a definitive expiration date in 2036, they aren’t going to spend a single dime here. They will look at the uncertainty, cancel their Canadian expansions, and build their factories directly inside the United States. This is the definition of structural economic suffocation.

Left in the Dust: Sidelined While Washington Deals with Mexico

Worse still, the Reuters brief confirms that Canada has been completely excommunicated from the actual architecture of continental trade. U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer has already scheduled a third formal negotiating round for the week of July 20th—with Mexico only. Washington currently has zero formal negotiations scheduled with Canada. We have been entirely left in the dust because the Carney administration has proven itself to be a deeply unprincipled, bad-faith actor. The Americans have presented a massive list of deep bilateral irritants—ranging from Canada’s protectionist dairy markets to progressive provincial boards actively pulling American liquor off local shelves.

Carney and his cabinet chose to prioritize cheap domestic political points to maintain power over the ashes rather than acting like a serious nation. The limits of opposition influence have been laid bare; look at the brilliant grassroots and international efforts of guys like Jamil Jivani. Jivani maintains exceptional, direct relationships with heavyweight figures in the U.S., including JD Vance, yet as an opposition member, there is only so much pressure he can apply when the executive branch is actively sabotaging the perimeter.

It’s important to remember that that Liberal Media machine is about to spin into overdrive to cover this all up. Stay vigilant and push back wisely to dismantle the BS coming from the machine.

Watch the full episode here:

Instead, what did we witness today? Prime Minister Mark Carney held a press conference to manage the narrative just days before the July 1st CUSMA (USMCA) review. But the moment the microphones went live and the reporters started digging, the entire illusion of control evaporated into a blank stare. Today, we expose the empty chair Canada left at the trade table, the absolute betrayal of Carney’s radio silence with Donald Trump, and a public humiliation delivered by one of Wall Street’s most powerful titans.

The Absent Partner: Mexico Exposes the Ottawa Blackout

During his opening 35-minute address, Mark Carney put on his classic central banker routine, reading from a highly sanitized PMO script designed to soothe anxious business owners.

Carney looked out at the press gallery and confidently declared:

“Despite challenges, Canada maintains the best deal of any major U.S. trading partnership with 85% of our trade remaining tariff-free. We’re working with the United States and Mexico to modernize CUSMA to provide greater certainty for workers and businesses.”

It sounds reassuring, doesn’t it? The problem is, they are just empty words. While Carney is busy telling Canadians that his team is actively “modernizing” the continent’s most valuable free-trade zone, our international partners are telling a completely different story.

For months, American officials have warned that Canada has been completely MIA in Washington, D.C., while Mexican negotiators have been on the ground working the halls for over a year. This week, the Mexican government explicitly pulled back the curtain. Mexico’s Economy Secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, released an official statement regarding an upcoming dynamic shift in the talks, and his phrasing dropped a bomb on Ottawa’s credibility. Ebrard confirmed that a trilateral meeting was finally scheduled for July 1st—after Canada was completely absent from the preparatory negotiations.

Naturally, the state broadcaster rushed to cover Carney’s tracks. When the CBC reported on Ebrard’s statement, they conveniently scrubbed the words “Canada was absent” entirely, presenting the upcoming July 1st virtual meeting as a routine, harmonious step. This is the corporate-state media apparatus working overtime to ensure you only hear what the PMO permits. They are actively manipulating the narrative while our multi-billion-dollar export economy is left completely unrepresented at the preliminary tables.

The Call: Carney’s Blank Stare on Donald Trump

The absolute climax of the press conference occurred during the Q&A segment. On Wednesday, the PMO proudly leaked that Mark Carney had finally held a direct, high-level phone call with U.S. President Donald Trump.

On Thursday morning, a reporter stood up and asked the bleeding obvious question: “The U.S. Ambassador said next steps would be at the presidential and prime ministerial level. How much did CUSMA play a role in your call with President Trump yesterday?”

Carney looked at the reporter, blinked, and delivered a jaw-dropping admission:

“We didn’t discuss CUSMA yesterday.”

Let that sink in. We are seven days away from an economic deadline that dictates the survival of our automotive, agricultural, and manufacturing sectors. The Prime Minister finally gets the President of the United States on the telephone, and he doesn’t bring up our most critical trade agreement a single time. Instead, Carney claimed the call was entirely focused on the Middle East.

When pressed on why he failed to advocate for Canadian workers, Carney retreated into typical technocratic doublespeak, claiming Canada takes a “team approach” involving Minister Charette, Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc, and Ambassador Mark Wiseman. He casually told the room, “There’ll come a point where that possibility emerges... We’re not going to sign a bad deal.”

“We could sign a bad deal this afternoon, right? We could have signed a bad deal a year ago. We’re not going to sign a bad deal. So it has to be a real deal.” — Prime Minister Mark Carney

Hey, Mark, if you’re so terrified of a “bad deal,” what was the draft agreement your administration was boasting about being “close” to signing last October? Why did you pull a radio-silent disappearing act the moment Donald Trump called you back to the table in February during the border bridge crisis? The truth is transparent: Carney is intentionally running out the clock. He has burned all of our continental leverage, gaslit the public, and is now terrified to sit across from Trump because he knows he has nothing left to barter with.

The Davos Delusion: Jamie Dimon Mocks the Prime Minister

Carney’s favourite international defence mechanism has always been his grand “Middle Powers Unite” philosophy—the speech he delivered at Davos begging Europe and mid-tier economies to band together to resist American protectionism.

Last week, during a high-profile Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) event, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon took to the stage and completely dismantled Carney’s globalist fantasy in public. Dimon didn’t just critique the policy; he openly ridiculed our Prime Minister’s worldview.

• The European Illusion: Dimon pointed out that Carney’s dream of Canada relying on Europe is a dead end. He noted that Europe’s collective GDP has violently eroded from 90% of America’s wealth down to a pathetic 70%.

• The Cost of Bureaucracy: Dimon warned that Europe is structurally declining due to crushing tax structures, bloated social safety nets, and an aggressively anti-business environment that suffocates capital formation.

• The Flight of Capital: While Carney talks about turning away from the U.S., Dimon dropped the real numbers: the U.S. stock exchange has ballooned to an unprecedented $60 to $70 trillion because global capital is fleeing European stagnation to chase American growth.

“When Mark Carney said, you know, the middle powers should get together. It’s a fantasy. They did that. It’s called Europe, you know... and it is hard to go to a CFR event these days where Europe doesn’t get dumped on, I’m afraid.” — Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase

Now, let’s be clear—I am no fan of Jamie Dimon. But his public evisceration of Carney is incredibly significant. These two men have a deep, bitter history of personal animosity dating back to September 2011, when Carney—acting as a global banking regulator—frequently clashed with Wall Street over post-2008 recovery compliance. They are not friends, but Dimon’s critique is entirely accurate. Carney’s desire to hook Canada’s wagon to a stagnant, over-regulated European market while insulting the largest economy on earth is an act of economic suicide.

The 0.7% “Surge”: The Globe and Mail’s Big Gaslight

As the real-world recession continues to squeeze Canadian families, the establishment media is trying to redefine what prosperity looks like. The Canadian Press published a high-and-mighty headline today proudly announcing: “There is little evidence of a recession with economic growth forecast to hit 0.7% in 2026.”

Think about the absolute audacity of that statement. The Laurentian elite are trying to gaslight you into believing that a pathetic 0.7% annualized growth forecast from Deloitte is a stunning victory. They want you to celebrate flatlining mediocrity. Meanwhile, right across the border, the U.S. economy is launching like a rocket ship, charting growth metrics of 3%, 4%, and 5%.

Our federal government is actively supervising the managed economic decline of this country, keeping our industries held down so their globalist networks can collect carbon credits, while the establishment press tells you to smile and accept the crumbs. I will never accept Canadian mediocrity as the standard.

The Bottom Line

The mind games are officially losing their efficacy. You cannot feed your children or pay your mortgage with a focus-group talking point. We are seven days away from the trade deadline, and our Prime Minister can’t even bring up CUSMA during a direct call with the White House.

Watch the full episode here:

Doug Ford is currently treading water in a sea of self-pity and plummeting approval metrics. He is a political chameleon who knows exactly how to read a room to keep his hands on the levers of power. The moment he realizes a federal partnership is dragging him beneath the waves, he will cut the line and throw anyone under the bus to act as his personal life raft.

The Angus Reid Polls and the “You’re the Liberal” Meltdown

The catalyst for the current panic inside Queen’s Park earlier this month in the form of a devastating new Angus Reid poll. The aggregate data paints a grim picture for the Ontario Premier, placing Doug Ford dead last in approval metrics among all sitting provincial premiers in Canada.

Naturally, because Ford lacks core ideological principles and relies entirely on a curated image of populist invincibility, his immediate reaction was to launch into a defensive tirade. Ford publicly lashed out at the data, branding Angus Reid a fake polling firm because the truth hurt his brand. The rhetoric got so toxic that Angus Reid took the step of issuing a formal, public statement demanding a public apology from the Premier.

To understand why Ford is acting out, you have to look back at his cynical betrayal during the last federal election. Everyday conservatives frequently ask me why Ford actively worked to sabotage Pierre Poilievre and the federal blue team. The answer is simple: Ford doesn’t care about conservative values. He saw an emotional, mainstream wave of anti-Trump hysteria manufactured by the media, assumed it was the winning horse, and hitched his cart directly to Mark Carney’s globalist wagon.

But now that the wheels are slowly coming off the Carney experiment, Ford is stuck on a sinking ship. This was put on spectacular display during a joint press conference on affordable housing alongside former Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson. A seasoned reporter named Colin stepped to the microphone and delivered a beautifully framed, devastating question:

“Politicians in this country have a shelf life, and it seems to be about eight or nine years. From Stephen Harper to Justin Trudeau to Dalton McGuinty... at the eight-year mark, they started hitting the numbers that you’re hitting now. Do you feel like Ontarians are turning the page on you?”

Ford lost his composure, attempting to deflect the question with a condescending joke: “Well, it’s a good question, Colin. My prediction is you’re going to go join the provincial Liberal Party and help them run.” But as Ford turned away, the reporter fired back a lightning-fast, quiet retort that echoed through the room: “No, you’re the Liberal.”

Visibly annoyed by being equated to folks like Truduau, Ford turned back to the room—which included Liberal ministers—he said: “In eight years, Justin Trudeau wasn’t sitting at forty-one percent! I’m Doug Ford. I’m not Dalton McGuinty. I’m not Kathleen Wynne. And I’m sure the heck no Justin Trudeau!”

Poltical Gimmicks and the Hoekstra Meeting

To desperate politicians, policy isn’t about structural improvement; it’s about distraction. To counter his catastrophic poll numbers, Doug Ford stood on the side of a highway to release a cheesy, video announcing that Ontario is raising highway speed limits to 110 km/h.

But look past the highway photo-op and watch the subtle diplomatic maneuvers. U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra dropped a fascinating post on X today, publishing a photograph of a meeting alongside Premier Ford:

Ambassador Hoekstra’s Statement: “Good to meet with Ford Nation today to talk trade and investment. US and Canadian businesses are building prosperity on both sides of the border. And Premier Ford and I want to see that continue and grow.”

This meeting is highly significant. Just last month, the Trump administration explicitly vetoed and canceled Doug Ford’s high-profile itinerary to Washington, D.C., because the White House deeply resented his past anti-tariff grandstanding. Ford clearly realized he completely destroyed his leverage with our most critical trading partner.

By running to Hoekstra this week, he is signaling to Washington that he is willing to start talking immediately, and he is preparing to cut Carney loose the exact second it becomes convenient.

The Bottom Line

Doug Ford can scream that he is different and pass out 110 km/h speed limits all he wants, but his actions reveal a man hunting for a life vest. He is a bellwether. The moment Doug Ford begins publicly criticizing Mark Carney’s lack of trade results this fall, you will know the federal Liberal regime is officially on its last legs.

You can view the full episode here:

The headline driving the news cycle this evening stems from a high-level diplomatic visit. Mark Carney spent the morning bragging about bringing the Prime Minister of Croatia to Canada for the first time in history.

Now, most everyday Canadians looking at this would rightfully ask, “Yeah, so what?” We already maintain standard bilateral trade with the European Council. The reality is that this entire visit could have been seamlessly handled by an entry-level ambassador.

But Carney desperately needed a premier photo-op to feed a very specific domestic narrative being pushed exclusively by the legacy media: the delusion that Mark Carney is the new, undisputed leader of the free world, filling the void while standing up to the populist winds in the United States. It was a pure vanity exercise to flash his G7 credentials to the public.

But before Carney could deliver his flowery, televised welcome, the microphones caught a raw exchange between the leaders discussing the mechanics of their respective parliamentary structures.

The Hot-Mic Moment: While the audio is muffled, Carney’s dismissive tonality is unmistakable as he lays bare his administrative hierarchy. Discussing the legislative process, Carney can be heard explicitly referring to elected representatives as “just MPs,” callously tossing out that “they’re useful for votes, but...” before turning his attention directly to his cabinet compliant structure.

The psychology behind this statement explains every single policy failure of the last year and a half. This is the predictable consequence of appointing a lifelong central banker—a man raised in the elite boardrooms of Goldman Sachs, the Bank of Canada, and the Bank of England—to run a constitutional democracy.

Technocrats do not understand representation. In Carney’s world, you don’t build consensus or listen to the ground; you simply manipulate economic levers, move pawns across a board, and command the room. He has never knocked a door in a working-class neighbourhood, never ran a small business, and never engaged in the retail grind of listening to regular, breathing human beings who suffer under his decisions. Rumblings out of the PMO have long alleged that Carney views his caucus as “unreasonable” This hot-mic confirms it. To him, Parliament isn’t the house of the people—it is a compliance machine built to rubber-stamp his globalist agenda.

While this clip won’t shift polling metrics overnight, it is a devastating piece of political ammunition. Six months from now, as CUSMA renegotiations flatline, housing collapses, and the economic pain intensifies, Canadians will look back at this audio and realize their Prime Minister views their local representatives as nothing more than voting cattle.

The Mexico Anecdote and the Elite Attack on Lived Experience

While Carney is dismissing the democratic process behind closed doors, the entire Liberal-NDP media apparatus spent the weekend throwing a coordinated temper tantrum over a simple, real-world anecdote shared by Pierre Poilievre.

During a press conference, Poilievre recounted meeting a woman from Vancouver who made the radical choice to relocate her entire life to Mexico purely because the escalating wave of violent crime in her neighbourhood left her feeling completely unsafe.

The left-wing internet immediately lost its collective mind. Progressive commentators launched into a mockingly nationalistic fury, accusing Poilievre of “talking down Canada” and fabricating “unscientific fake news.” The sheer elitism was stunning to witness. The exact same urban progressives who constantly preach about “borderless inclusivity” suddenly morphed into aggressive nationalists, looking down their noses at Mexico to protect the illusion that our streets are perfectly safe.

The establishment’s desperation backfired on Sunday morning when the actual woman from the airport came forward on social media. Writing under the handle Lioness on X, she verified the entire interaction, stating:

“I am the woman Pierre Poilievre met at the airport—the one who feels much safer in Mexico. I’d love to share my story.”

The progressive elite are utterly terrified of direct, unvarnished lived experience because it forces a confrontation with their own policy failures. If they admit our streets have become unsafe, it means their ideological worldview is fundamentally broken. So, they choose to aggressively attack the messenger.

The Bottom Line

The machine can wheel out Sean Fraser, stack their panels, and parade international leaders through Ottawa all they want. But the mask is completely gone. On a hot mic, the Prime Minister admits he views our democratic system as a game of voting cattle. At the podium, his ministers tell you that your fear of street violence is just a political hallucination.

They aren’t interested in securing your community or respecting your vote; they are running a corporate management operation to protect their own political survival.

Watch the full episode here:

Get more from Josh Udall in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

Read more

Well, the bill is coming due. U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth delivered a devastating defence ministerial address that put Carney and team on notice. Meanwhile, the European Union completely inverted its immigration policy, and back home, common-sense Canadians scored a massive, humane victory against the state’s expanding euthanasia machine.

The old era is dying. Let’s get directly into the reality of the collapse.

Pete Hegseth Lashes Out At the “Middle Power” Delusion

For the last decade, the ruling elite across the Western world operated under a singular, unchallenged set of delusions: open borders, unrestricted global migration, a total reliance on American military protection, and the belief that hollow international institutions would manage human conflict. They treated globalism as an unalterable law of nature.

Then the American populist movement completely flipped the board. While the establishment spent Carney’s tenure throwing tantrums at Davos and begging “middle powers” to band together to fight the tide of sovereignty, the Americans took notice. Washington has watched with absolute fury as the Carney administration slow-rolled trade talks while inviting Chinese state enterprises directly into our continental backyard.

Because Carney loves to tie Canada’s identity to the coat-tails of the European elite, he was the direct target of a massive, unvarnished lashing out by U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth at the NATO Defense Ministerial in Brussels.

Hegseth looked directly at the assembly and fired a shot straight through the heart of Ottawa’s defence policy:

“Some of NATO’s largest economies, some of our richest countries, allies that are happiest to go on about the rules-based international order and middle powers banding together still seem to think the era of free riding is here.”

The Return of Hard Power

Hegseth made it brutally clear: the United States is officially done acting as an unpaid, unappreciated bodyguard for wealthy nations that refuse to carry their own weight. Washington is structurally transforming NATO back into a raw military alliance focused on hard power and absolute deterrence—a “NATO 3.0” modeled on the exact peace-through-strength framework that won the Cold War.

The expectation moving forward is simple: secure your own borders, protect your own populations, and fund your own conventional defence. The globalist machine thrives by extracting economic sovereignty from the working class, offshoring manufacturing to the third world for pennies on the dollar, and utilizing unchecked migration to artificially flood western labor markets. The Americans have officially shut off the piggy bank. If Canada refuses to build a serious military perimeter, we will be left entirely out in the cold.

The EU Enacts the Great Migration Reversal

If you want further proof that Mark Carney’s globalist worldview is on its way out, look at what just transpired inside the European Parliament. For years, the European elite lectured the world about the moral necessity of open borders, shaming any citizen who demanded common-sense immigration controls.

This week, the system snapped. In a historic vote, the European Union officially passed a sweeping framework designed to completely halt the unvetted flow of migration.

The scene on the parliament floor was pure chaos, split between nationalist cheers to “send them back” and the response from progressives of “shame on you”.

The establishment has officially lost control of the narrative. Independent nations are reclaiming their borders, recognizing that without a secure perimeter, a country ceases to exist. This is an absolute nightmare scenario for leaders like Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, and Mark Carney. The globalist agenda is entering its twilight era, and no amount of focus-group terminology can stop the return of national sovereignty.

The Bottom Line

The globalists are running out of road. Populations are beginning to wake up to the fact that the elites don’t want to protect your safety—they want to manage your decline.

You can watch the full episode here:

We saw this exact dynamic play out in real-time last night. U.S. President Donald Trump threw a massive grenade into the continental trade ecosystem, explicitly stating that he is leaning toward terminating the USMCA (CUSMA). As per usual, Trump operated like a master negotiator—shifting the target, playing a game of psychological ping-pong, and keeping Ottawa in a state of absolute, unmitigated panic.

While our media establishment and political class have spent the last 18 months arrogantly claiming “we don’t need the Americans,” the moment Trump twitches, they begin getting nervous. In this article I pull back the curtain on Trump’s actual warnings, the pathetic consensus of the Ottawa establishment, and the cold reality check delivered by the private sector that our government refuses to acknowledge.

Termination: Trump’s CUSMA Ping-Pong

Let’s look directly at the transcript of what Donald Trump actually said last night, because the mainstream networks are simply guessing at what Trump meant. His statement was:

“To be honest with you, I’m not a big fan of it. I liked it because it got us out of NAFTA... We do better without an agreement. I would rather leave it unsigned. I’d rather have it terminated... I may sign it, right? But we do better as a country if we don’t have an agreement. I’m thinking about maybe we won’t be able to make a deal.”

This is classic Art of the Deal. Trump is intentionally creating a cloud of uncertainty to completely frustrate and disorient Canadian negotiators. But he dropped one crucial detail that Ottawa is desperate to ignore: the six-year sunset clause. He openly laughed that the original negotiators only agreed to the timeline because they assumed he wouldn’t be around in 2026 to enforce it. Well, he is here, and has a finger on the trigger.

2. The Ottawa Uniparty and the “Glass Half-Full” Gaslight

Instead of reacting with urgency, the establishment immediately deployed a prime-time panel on CTV to soothe the masses. Watching this panel was a masterclass in how the political class protects its own sandbox.

They brought on Dmitri Soudas, the former Director of Communications for Stephen Harper. Soudas looked directly into the camera and told Canadians that just because Mark Carney didn’t get an official bilateral meeting with Trump at the G7 summit, it doesn’t mean deals aren’t happening. Soudas fallback was a cozy anecdote from the 2010 Muskoka G7 summit:

“At 11:30 at night, Barack Obama and Stephen Harper sat on a couch and shushed all of us away... and that’s where they made a deal for Canada to extend its military mission to Afghanistan in a non-combat role in exchange for a deal on the Buy America policy. If Prime Minister Carney had some private conversations, which I suspect he did, I will see my glass as half full today.”

As Soudas was spinning this yarn, look at who was nodding along right next to him: Sharan Kaur and Laura D’Angelo—both former senior staffers inside the Trudeau PMO and the Liberal finance department.

This is the definition of the Uniparty. Soudas spends his days online screaming that he is a die-hard conservative, yet here he is on national television completely aligning with corporate Liberals to protect the status quo. He is living 14 years in the past. He acts as if the gentlemanly, institutional rules of the Stephen Harper era apply to the hyper-aggressive geopolitical reality of 2026. They aren’t trying to save your job or your community; they are trying to protect the credibility of the elite system that guarantees their consulting salaries.

Mark Warner’s Warning: Stop Playing Chicken with a Bull

Thankfully, CBC actually brought on an actual private-sector expert to inject some sanity into the conversation: international trade lawyer Mark Warner. Warner delivered a devastating, down-to-earth reality check that completely demolished the establishment’s “cozy couch” narrative.

Warner reminded the audience that the shift from NAFTA to the USMCA wasn’t just a superficial rebranding exercise—it was explicitly engineered to target Communist China. The agreement fundamentally altered the rules of origin for the automotive sector to prevent Chinese backdoor circumvention. Warner warned that Washington—under both Biden and Trump—is deadly serious about enforcing these perimeter controls, and that Ottawa’s domestic gaslighting is actively making the situation worse:

“Some of the rhetoric which the government is using for domestic purposes, in my view, to calm the passions at home, are in a digital world where the Americans can hear what we’re saying and see what we’re saying. It probably goes under the fingernails of the American negotiators.”

Warner issued a chilling warning to the law professors currently advising Mark Carney that Trump won’t actually terminate the treaty: look at history. Trump unilaterally pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization. If Ottawa tries to corner him or call his bluff based on academic technicalities, Trump will proudly pull the plug.

The Liberal strategy isn’t a trade strategy; it is a desperate attempt to run out the clock, hide behind the courts, and pray for a miracle. It is a catastrophic failure of leadership.

The Secret Twelve and Anand’s Forced Labor Dodge

The absolute peak of the evening occurred when Vassy Kapelos completely popped the panel’s corporate balloon with a single, crushing observation. She noted that a bombshell report by Tonda MacCharles in the Toronto Star had reminded people that a highly specific list of a dozen major concessions the Americans are demanding from Canada.

Kapelos bluntly stated: “I’ve never heard a single thing about any of those things from anyone in the government.” They are keeping voters completely in the dark because the truth destroys their “everything is fine” marketing campaign.

The Bottom Line

The establishment can spin the data, swap out panels, and tell you to look at their half-full glasses all they want. But at the end of the day, you cannot pay your mortgage with an anecdote from a 2010 couch session. The Americans are demand-driven, they are locked in on China, and our government is completely unprepared for the July deadline.

We will be keeping a close eye on this as it goes on.

Watch the full episode here:

But I promised you that if something happened abroad that was actually worth covering, I’d bring it to you. That moment happened last night during CNN anchor Kaitlin Collins’ interview with our very own Prime Minister, Mark Carney.

The interview covered a plethora of global topics, but there was one segment that left me absolutely flabbergasted. Carney’s shocking international rhetoric.

The International Stage and Carney’s Wild Iran Rubric

There is a very specific, pathological quirk to Mark Carney’s leadership style: He utterly despises the domestic Canadian media, but he worships international cameras.

When he is here in Canada, Carney doesn’t have the time of day for local journalists. He limits his appearances, ducks hard questions, and treats domestic reporting as an inconvenient chore. But the moment he steps onto the international stage at an event like the G7? He has all the time in the world. He leans back, smiles, and speaks with a level of relaxed charm you never see on Canadian soil. He fears the elite institutional critiques of Bloomberg, CNN, and the Financial Times far more than he respects the citizens he was elected to govern.

Because he changes his tenor depending on his audience, you never truly know who Mark Carney is or what he actually stands for. He wrote a whole book called Values, yet his principles shift like sand. When he talks to Canadians, he constantly rips on Donald Trump to stoke local anxieties. But on CNN? He bends over backward to look like a tough-talking continental partner.

When Kaitlin Collins asked him about the ongoing conflict involving Iran, Carney launched into a chest-beating rant that should make every moderate voter do a double-take:

“I answered this question three years ago at Davos... I’ve always believed that Iran is the biggest exporter of terror, hellbent on getting a nuclear weapon... The reintegration of Iran, this is a regime that needs to learn to be civilized. It needs to behave.”

Let’s be entirely real for a second: “A regime that needs to learn to be civilized.”

Could you imagine the absolute media nuclear meltdown if Pierre Poilievre uttered those exact words? The state broadcaster would be running 24/7 panels calling him a bigot, a racist, and an unhinged warmonger. But because it came out of the mouth of the golden boy of the Laurentian elite, it’s treated as sophisticated diplomacy.

The China Blind Spot

What makes Carney’s tough-guy routine so hollow is his selective amnesia regarding Beijing. He is more than happy to beat his chest on international television about Iran and Russia, claiming we must stop Putin and force rogue regimes to “behave.”

But where is that energy when it comes to Communist China?

• China is the primary economic engine funding Russia’s war machine in Ukraine.

• China is actively bankrolling the Iranian regime through sanctioned trade supply lines.

• Yet, Carney has signed a security MOU with Beijing, remains silent on their domestic interference, and is actively trying to flood our roads with 49,000 Chinese EVs.

None of it adds up, because it isn’t meant to. Mark Carney has no core values. He is simply playing an international public relations game to buy himself time in the master seat, advance globalist ideology, enrich his networks, and take off when the bills finally come due.

The View From Fox Business: Canada the “Laggard”

While Carney is busy playing global philosopher on CNN, the American business class is locked in on a very specific date: Wednesday, July 1, 2026.

Fox Business ran a segment this week with a giant graphic of the July 2026 calendar, circling the upcoming CUSMA/USMCA renegotiation deadline. And let’s be honest with ourselves: America doesn’t wake up thinking about Canada, but Canada absolutely wakes up thinking about America. This is one of those rare moments where the U.S. right-wing media is paying attention to us, and the view from the south is deeply embarrassing.

The anchor, Brian, opened the segment with a devastating indictment of our current trade strategy:

“The USMCA trade agreement progress is looking dicey. Why is Canada making it all about themselves? The country’s ambassador admitting that tariff relief is a higher priority to them in these negotiations than the trade treaty itself.”

U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer is already openly hostile to Canada’s conduct, explicitly accusing our government of slow-rolling critical treaty talks by imposing petulant retaliatory tariffs on American goods.

The Ultimate Trump Card

Fox brought on Steve Moore, the co-founder of Unleash Prosperity, to lay out the cold economic reality of how Canada is viewed by our largest trading partner. When asked if Canada was “misbehaving,” Moore didn’t hold back:

“This is a trade war that Canada can’t possibly win. Their saber-rattling here is not a very good idea... Canada still imposes pretty high tariffs on American dairy products, agricultural products, and timber. It is not a level playing field... Canada has been an economic laggard, no question about it.”

When the anchor pushed Moore on whether Canada’s economy is structurally stuck in a recession, Moore verified what the Liberal spin doctors spend every day denying: Canada is a slow-growing economic laggard that is fundamentally, entirely dependent on the massive U.S. economy to survive.

That is the ultimate “Trump card” Washington holds over Ottawa. You can be lied to by Mark Carney all you want about “diversifying our trade supply chains to Europe or Asia,” but it is a mathematical impossibility. If we lose seamless access to the American market, our economy collapses. Instead of fixing our structural issues, building a self-reliant economy, and dealing in good faith, our administration is playing reckless games with our nation’s bread and butter.

View the full episode here:

If you want to understand the profound underlying sickness of the ruling class here in Canada, you only need to look at a single, simple contrast: what they refuse to govern versus what they demand to control.

Every single day, the Ottawa elite look directly into the cameras and read from the same focus-group script. Trust us, they say. Everything is fine. The plan is working. But while they use comfortable, sanitized language to manage your perception of our country’s decline, they are actively bartering away our national sovereignty abroad and quietly assembling an authoritarian digital hellscape here at home.

This afternoon, Prime Minister Mark Carney was caught on a hot mic desperately trying to placate U.S. President Donald Trump over Chinese electric vehicles, reducing a massive national security threat to a mere inventory game. Meanwhile, back on Parliament Hill, the Liberals are quietly racing to push through a trio of interconnected bills designed to establish absolute state surveillance over your digital life.

The EV Hot-Mic: Bartering Security for Globalist Favour

Let’s start with the audio that has everyone in Ottawa talking today. Reporters and cameras were briefly allowed into a high-level room, capturing a striking moment where Mark Carney leaned over a chair to whisper assurances directly into Donald Trump’s ear.

Carney’s mission? Reassuring the White House that Canada’s backdoor openness to Chinese-made electric vehicles isn’t a threat to the American perimeter. At. that time, David Cochrane over at the CBC scrambled onto the airwaves to help the PMO spin what occurred, confirming that Carney was bragging about a “hard cap” on Chinese auto imports.

The Ottawa Spin: The PMO wants you to look at the numbers. They are claiming Chinese EVs will be strictly capped at just 3% of the Canadian auto market—amounting to roughly 49,000 cars today, with a projected crawl up to 70,000 over the next five years. Carney literally told Trump, “We figured that you would like that.”

It is a slick, corporate framing technique, and it is a semantic lie. Carney and the state broadcaster are intentionally trying to turn a profound national security threat into a mundane commercial inventory dispute. The piece that was extremely eye opening was Carney honing in on that 3% figure. When in reality bringing in 49k Chinese EVs would take up close to 30% of Canada’s EV market.

Let’s be entirely real about what a modern smart vehicle actually is. It isn’t just steel, glass, and rubber anymore; it is a sophisticated, rolling computer system. A modern EV possesses advanced sensor suites, cameras, and GPS arrays tied to a live, uninterrupted data link.

When you allow 49,000 of these vehicles onto Canadian roads, you are effectively letting an adversarial regime map out your critical infrastructure, track your military installations, and log the movement patterns of your citizens in real-time. If your adversary has the technological architecture to spy inside your borders, it doesn’t matter if the number of vehicles is 10, 10k, or 49k.

By reducing our national security to a trade quota, Mark Carney is proving that Canadian sovereignty is simply a commodity he is willing to barter away piece by piece to maintain favour with globalist institutions.

The worst part? The Americans see right through it. Cochrane admitted himself that there is absolute, zero-bipartisan appetite in Washington for Canada’s Chinese EV loopholes. When Trump eventually drops the hammer on this setup, the Liberals will act shocked and blame “American unpredictability.” But the truth is, Carney is setting us up for an absolute trade disaster.

The Three-Headed Censorship Monster: C-22, C-34, and C-36

Over the past few weeks, the Liberals have introduced three distinct bills: Bill C-22, Bill C-34, and Bill C-36. They are marketing them as separate, unrelated pieces of standard policy. One is branded as protecting children, another as modernizing commercial privacy, and the third as helping police track down digital criminals.

But if you look past the titles and map out the internal mechanics, you realize these aren’t separate bills at all. They are a three-headed regulatory monster designed to cross the finish line together, creating an unprecedented digital regulatory superpower.

Prominent Canadian privacy expert Michael Geist recently sounded a massive alarm on the latest iteration, Bill C-36 (the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Bill). Geist exposed that buried deep inside this massive text is a radical, unprecedented shift in how our data is handled. The bill effectively terminates the independent Privacy Commissioner’s decades-long oversight over private-sector privacy law, transferring that immense power to a brand-new, unelected body: the Digital Safety and Data Protection Commission.

Build Canada put out a brilliant infographic mapping out exactly how these three pieces of legislation converge to build a state surveillance apparatus:

• Bill C-34 (The Trojan Horse): Marketed as a clean social media ban for children under the age of 16. But hidden inside the text, the government grants itself the sweeping authority to unilaterally order the removal of any online content they subjectively deem to be “terrorist activity” or “hateful speech.”

• Bill C-36 (The Privacy Lock): Strips authority away from independent agents of Parliament and hands full control over all private consumer data held on Canadians to an unelected, five-member political commission.

• Bill C-22 (The Surveillance Mandate): Imposes a mandatory one-year retention period on your metadata, forces encryption mandates, and lowers the legal threshold required for law enforcement to seize your digital identity and inspect your private communications.

  

The Footprints of Bill C-63

To understand how insidious this strategy is, you have to trace these bills back to their true origin story: Bill C-63, the infamous Online Harms Act introduced two years ago in 2024.

Remember what Bill C-63 attempted to do? It was an aggressive, overreaching bill that tried to grant a politically appointed board the power to police your speech, regulate social media algorithms, and structurally imprison citizens based on the mere suspicion that they might commit a hate crime in the future. The public pushback was intense, and the Liberals realized that packing that much authoritarian control into a single bill was a political mistake.

So, what did they do? They chopped the carcass of Bill C-63 into three separate pieces. They spaced out their introductions over the last two months, wrapped them in flowery, emotionally manipulative language about “protecting kids,” and let them glide through the legislative pipeline under the radar.

When these three bills pass, they will all feed directly into the exact same centralized entity: the Digital Safety and Data Protection Commission. This unelected, five-member super-regulator will hold unchecked authority over what you are allowed to say, what stays private, and who the state is allowed to watch.

The Bottom Line

This is the definitive blueprint of modern Ottawa. A government that talks endlessly about “digital safety” while systematically stripping away your privacy rights, and brags about “cooperation” while covering its tracks behind closed doors, isn’t interested in governing.

They want to manage your perception of their decline. They want you to accept a wide-open border, a compromised national security perimeter, and total surveillance inside your own home. But we are equipping this community with the raw facts to push back.

We have compiled the full legislative breakdowns, Geist’s complete analysis, and the Build Canada infographics here in this artcile. Get armed with the data, and start having the hard conversations that change minds.

Watch full episode here:

The Fentanyl Czar’s Flowery Press Conference

Cast your mind back to last year. The Liberal government was in an absolute state of panic over Donald Trump’s looming tariff threats regarding border security and transnational drug pipelines. As a pure public relations reaction, Justin Trudeau appointed a national “fentanyl czar,” Kevin Brosseau, to prove Ottawa was finally getting tough.

Then, for an entire year, Brosseau vanished into the administrative shadows. No updates, no strategies, no public accountability. Today, we finally got a press conference, and the resulting performance was a masterclass in bureaucratic grandstanding.

When directly confronted by a journalist about why the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) actually seized less fentanyl in 2025 than it did in 2024, Brosseau stammered through a labyrinth of “ums” and “ahs.”

The Czar’s Defense: Brosseau waved away the drop in border seizures by labeling it a “slight decrease” and postulating that the drug trade is now primarily a matter of “domestic production for domestic consumption.” He suggested that traffickers have simply “diverted” their transmission methods, and promised he would eventually follow up with the CBSA president to check her “views” on the matter.

Let’s translate that from Ottawa-speak to reality: The border is a sieve, and the czar has no real power.

As independent journalist Sam Cooper exposed, Brosseau reportedly admitted to U.S. officials behind closed doors that he possesses zero actual operational authority. He isn’t orchestrating high-level tactical stings or dismantling kingpins; he is a highly paid middleman whose sole mandate is to ensure “information flows freely” while keeping the Americans placated.

Worse yet, his domestic production narrative completely ignores the elephant in the room: precursor chemicals. The lifeblood of the Canadian fentanyl crisis consists of raw chemical precursors flooding uninterrupted through our ports in British Columbia, which are then cooked in sophisticated local cartel labs. Brosseau spent his five minutes offering warm sentiments and flowery language, inadvertently confirming that Ottawa’s drug strategy is entirely performative. They don’t want to stop the trade; they want to stop the negative headlines.

The Forced Labor Bill with a Kingly Backdoor

This brings us to the legislative double game happening concurrently on Parliament Hill. On Friday, the government introduced Bill C-35, framed as a sweeping, good-faith measure to satisfy the Trump administration by shutting down companies that introduce forced labor into their supply chains.

On the surface, it looks great. It’s the exact kind of virtue-signaling piece of paper the Liberal communications team loves to print. But when you bypass the press release and actually read the fine print of Bill C-35, you find a massive, corrupt backdoor: The federal cabinet retains the unilateral authority to grant a total pass to whoever they so please.

It is the legislative equivalent of giving the crown the powers of a medieval king. They can look at a massive corporate donor or a strategic state enterprise importing components tainted by Uyghur slave labor and quietly grant them an administrative caveat. The American administration is not stupid. They see through these legal loopholes, and it’s precisely why Washington is continuing to hold an economic gun to our heads.

The Total CUSMA Blackout: Icing Out the Experts

If the border situation is alarming, the total lack of transparency surrounding the CUSMA (USMCA) renegotiations should terrify every single business owner and worker in this country.

Veteran legislator elected in 2008, MP Randy Hoback spoke to the press on Parliament Hill.

According to Hoback, that era of diplomatic collaboration is officially dead.

“We being an opposition party, we’re not privy to what’s at the table. We haven’t been briefed on what the issues between Canada, Trump, and Mr. LeBlanc are talking about... There has been zero consultation. You talk to stakeholders, and they are terrified because they aren’t getting a single piece of information back from this government either.”

This administration is keeping Canada’s most important trade agreement entirely behind closed doors. They are telling our multi-billion-dollar export industries to “sit tight” while they quietly kick the can down the road, hoping the problem solves itself.

To understand how reckless this is, look at the political context. A Politico report from a few months back detailed that Hoback spent months compiling a comprehensive, 70-page strategic roadmap on Canada-U.S. relations, conducting 26 intensive roundtables and consulting 290 independent economic stakeholders. Instead, the Carney administration has frozen out the experts to operate in total isolation. It isn’t just incompetence anymore; it feels like deliberate malice.

The Censorship Blueprint: Managing Our Decline

When a government completely fails to secure its borders, fails to protect its trade supply chains, and presides over a contracting economy, they are left with only one survival mechanism: controlling what you are allowed to say about it.

Look at the federal government’s sudden, aggressive push to ban social media for children under the age of 16. They want you to think this is a wholesome, protective initiative for youth mental health. But we’ve already seen this exact blueprint executed in Australia and Great Britain.

As independent analysts like Peter Sweden have documented, when these foreign administrations implemented their youth bans on platforms like X, they curiously left decentralized, establishment-friendly alternatives like Blue Sky completely unrestricted.

The strategy is transparent. The political class has completely lost control of the narrative on open platforms where independent journalism thrives. They cannot stop channels like The Elevate Report from broadcasting the raw data. So, under the guise of “child safety,” they are building an infrastructure to funnel the next generation away from independent platforms and into algorithmic gardens heavily monitored and controlled by corporate-state partnerships.

The Bottom Line

This is the definitive blueprint of modern Ottawa in a nutshell. The establishment does not want to govern; they want to manage your perception of their dramatic decline.

They expect you to quietly accept less security at our ports, zero transparency in our trade agreements, and total surveillance inside your digital home. The next time a mainstream anchor sits on your television screen telling you the administration is making “steady progress,” hit them with the reality: A government that talks about cooperation while covering its tracks, and speaks about your safety while systematically seizing your digital rights, isn’t governing you.

They are ruling you.

Watch the whole episode here:

While Toronto police were mourning their fallen brother, the political and corporate elite were gathering downtown for the annual Eurasia Group Canada-U.S. Summit, co-sponsored by RBC.

U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra kicked off the summit by acknowledging Constable Pinizzotto’s sacrifice, rightly noting that it exemplifies the blood-bound tactical cooperation between American and Canadian law enforcement. But when Hoekstra sat down for his main address, he echoed an observation he previously made right here on The Elevate Report: Washington and Ottawa are talking completely past each other.

“You really need to be a good listener... What Canada thinks they are saying is not necessarily what America is hearing. And that’s really tough in negotiations. You may be sitting across from each other talking back and forth, but you don’t have a shared understanding.”

The Liberal Party is filled with who I believe to be pawns who genuinely believe that issues like the 49,000 Chinese EVs, illegal CCP police stations, and open-border drug trafficking are just minor details that the opposition are blowing out of proportion. They honestly think we can just glide back into a status-quo trade relationship without addressing continental security. Hardening our borders, clamping down on foreign espionage, and flushing out the IRGC wouldn’t just satisfy the Americans—it would save our own communities. Yet, the Liberals refuse to act until they are forced to by an economic gun to their heads.

Dominic LeBlanc’s Shocking About-Face

This brings us to the absolute highlight of the summit: a stunning, hypocritical pivot from Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc that left every political insider in the room doing a double-take.

After 18 months of the Liberal Party screaming that Donald Trump was a volatile threat to global stability, LeBlanc stood before the audience and completely flipped the script.

LeBlanc told the crowd:

“President Trump ran an election campaign to impose tariffs. He won convincingly and he’s implementing the agenda that he told Americans he would...Canada should not be emotionally vested in how American politicians speak to American voters.”

Let that sink in. The Liberal front bench is now explicitly telling Canadians to stop having an emotional “hissy fit” over Donald Trump’s rhetoric. They are acknowledging that Trump won a massive, convincing mandate and is simply doing exactly what he promised he would do.

Why the sudden, dramatic change in tune? Because the July 1st CUSMA review deadline is three weeks away, and the Carney Liberals have suddenly realized they have zero leverage. Their grand strategy of “defying Washington” and “diversifying our trade to Europe” has borne fruit. They are terrified of an absolute economic wipeout, so they are throwing their old talking points directly into the dumpster to play the role of the mature, accommodating trade partner. It is a cynical, desperate flip-flop from an administration running on pure survival instinct.

The Bottom Line

We are witnessing the systemic unraveling of the establishment narrative. On one side of the city, a brave officer is killed executing a warrant birthed by foreign terrorist operations that Ottawa ignored. On the other side of the city, a senior Liberal minister stands at an elite geopolitical summit, performing a frantic diplomatic about-face to beg for an American trade exemption.

They cannot hide the decay anymore. The system is broken, the security perimeter is compromised, and the bills are coming due all at once.

Watch the full episode here:

As the July 1 trade review deadline approaches, one question is beginning to dominate conversations on both sides of the border: what happens if the United States decides it no longer wants to play by the rules of the current North American trade agreement?

This week, for the first time in months, President Donald Trump directly addressed the future of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (USMCA), known in Canada as CUSMA. And his comments sent immediate shockwaves through political circles, media outlets, and trade observers alike.

Asked whether he was confident the agreement would be renewed, Trump’s answer was blunt.

“I’m not looking to renew it.”

For Canadian officials who have spent months assuring the public that negotiations remain productive, those words landed like a thunderclap.

But as dramatic as the headline sounds, the real story may not be what Trump said. The real story is what he meant.

Trump’s Message Was Bigger Than Trade

The comments themselves were classic Trump.

He argued that the United States does not need Canadian energy, lumber, automobiles, or other exports. He repeated a long-standing complaint that America runs trade deficits with both Canada and Mexico and suggested the United States would be better off without the agreement than accepting a bad deal.

On the surface, those claims are easy to challenge.

Canada remains a major supplier of energy to the United States. American manufacturers continue to rely on Canadian aluminum, critical minerals, and integrated supply chains. Cross-border trade supports millions of jobs in both countries. The economic relationship is deeply interconnected.

Even many American economists would acknowledge that the relationship benefits both sides.

But focusing exclusively on those details risks missing the broader point.

Trump has always approached negotiations through leverage. His strategy is rarely to begin with compromise. Instead, he creates uncertainty, raises the stakes, and forces counterparts to respond.

Viewed through that lens, his comments appear less like an economic analysis and more like a warning shot.

The question is: a warning shot about what?

The China Issue Continues to Loom

If there is one theme that continues to emerge from American officials, trade analysts, and foreign policy experts, it is China.

While Canadian political discourse often focuses on tariffs, softwood lumber disputes, energy exports, or automotive manufacturing, Washington’s concerns increasingly revolve around something much larger: strategic competition with Beijing.

The Trump administration has made no secret of its desire to reduce Chinese influence throughout North America.

From Washington’s perspective, the issue is not simply trade balances. It is whether Canada is aligning itself with American economic and security priorities or moving closer to China’s sphere of influence.

That concern has repeatedly surfaced in discussions surrounding investment, supply chains, critical minerals, technology, and trade policy.

For many observers in Washington, the future of USMCA is increasingly tied to those broader geopolitical questions.

That is why Trump’s remarks should not be interpreted as a simple declaration that America no longer needs Canada.

Rather, they appear to be a message that future trade arrangements may depend on whether Canada demonstrates that it remains a serious strategic partner.

The Communication Gap Is Growing

One of the most frustrating aspects of the current situation is the lack of transparency surrounding negotiations.

Canadians are regularly told discussions are ongoing.

Federal ministers insist conversations are happening. Officials speak of productive engagement. Public messaging suggests progress.

Yet the signals coming from Washington often tell a different story.

American officials have repeatedly indicated that they do not see Canadian negotiators as frequently as Ottawa suggests. Meanwhile, Canadian officials remain tight-lipped about what is actually being discussed behind closed doors.

The result is a growing credibility gap.

Canadians hear that negotiations are advancing, while American voices continue to signal frustration.

Without greater clarity, it becomes increasingly difficult to determine where talks truly stand.

That uncertainty matters because trade negotiations are not occurring in a vacuum. Businesses are making investment decisions today. Manufacturers are making long-term planning decisions today. Markets are watching today.

And uncertainty is expensive.

The Media Narrative Is Already Taking Shape

Predictably, much of the media response to Trump’s comments has focused on one specific claim: his assertion that America does not need Canada.

Over the coming days, Canadians will likely hear countless economists, commentators, and political figures point out the obvious flaws in that argument.

And many of those criticisms will be valid.

The United States absolutely benefits from access to Canadian resources and integrated supply chains.

But there is a danger in stopping the analysis there.

Because if the conversation becomes solely about proving that Trump needs Canadian energy or Canadian lumber, then Canada risks missing the larger strategic issue entirely.

The real question is not whether the United States needs Canada.

The real question is whether the United States believes Canada is acting like the kind of partner it wants beside it in a rapidly changing global economy.

That is a much harder question to answer.

Ottawa’s Challenge Is Growing

The timing could hardly be worse for Prime Minister Mark Carney.

In just days, international leaders will gather for the G7 summit, where trade, security, and geopolitical alignment will dominate discussions.

At the same time, questions about Canada’s economic direction continue to intensify.

For months, Carney’s government has attempted to balance multiple priorities: maintaining access to American markets, expanding relationships elsewhere, and managing an increasingly complex relationship with China.

The challenge is that Washington appears to view those objectives through a much more binary lens.

From the American perspective, economic security and national security are increasingly inseparable.

That means trade negotiations are no longer just about tariffs and quotas. They are about strategic alignment.

And that changes everything.

A Defining Test for Canada

None of this means CUSMA/USMCA is dead.

In fact, Trump’s history suggests dramatic rhetoric is often part of a larger negotiation strategy.

He has frequently used public pressure to create leverage before eventually reaching agreements.

The agreement could still be renewed. Negotiators could still find common ground. Both countries still have enormous economic incentives to maintain stable trade relations.

But Canadians would be wise to recognize that the conversation has evolved.

This is no longer simply a debate about lumber, steel, automobiles, or trade deficits.

It is increasingly a debate about Canada’s place within North America’s economic and security framework.

Trump’s comments may dominate headlines because of their shock value.

But beneath the rhetoric lies a much more important reality: Washington is demanding clarity about where Canada stands.

Whether Ottawa is prepared to provide that clarity may determine not only the future of CUSMA, but the future of Canada’s most important economic relationship.

And with July 1 rapidly approaching, the clock is ticking.

View the full episode here:

According to reporting from The Globe and Mail, a planned US Chamber of Commerce reception in Washington featuring Doug Ford was abruptly cancelled after White House officials allegedly voiced complaints about the Ontario Premier’s participation. The event—reportedly scheduled as part of Ford’s high-profile visit to the U.S. capital—was intended to include Ross Perot Jr., chair of the Chamber’s board, and serve as a key networking moment with American business leadership.

On paper, the cancellation was attributed to “scheduling conflicts.” But multiple unnamed sources familiar with the situation told reporters a different story: that concerns had been communicated from the White House to business figures in Washington ahead of the event, and that Ford himself was viewed as politically problematic within the Trump administration’s orbit.

Neither Ford’s office, the US Chamber of Commerce, nor Ross Perot Jr. responded publicly in detail, and the White House has not formally confirmed any involvement in the decision. That silence leaves room for interpretation—but in politics, silence often speaks just as loudly as statements.

And that’s where the real question emerges: what exactly triggered this level of friction?

From the perspective of Ford’s critics—and increasingly, from segments of the American political ecosystem—the Ontario Premier has spent the past year oscillating between economic diplomacy and hard-edged political rhetoric toward the United States. At various points, Ford has floated aggressive countermeasures in response to trade tensions, including remarks about energy exports and alcohol product removals during earlier disputes. While those statements were made in a different political context, they continue to circulate in Washington’s institutional memory.

Whether or not those past remarks directly influenced the White House’s reported discomfort, the perception matters. In international politics, consistency is currency—and inconsistency gets priced in quickly.

Ford’s recent media strategy in the United States has also been a balancing act. On one hand, he has emphasized Ontario’s role in North American energy and critical minerals supply chains, pitching what he calls a “Fortress North America” approach to compete with China and stabilize investment flows. On the other hand, his messaging has sometimes been interpreted as reactive rather than strategic, particularly when addressing trade uncertainty and tariff risk.

In a recent U.S. media appearance, Ford argued that deeper integration between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico could strengthen economic resilience, increase investment certainty, and stabilize supply chains. Those claims are not controversial in isolation—but they exist alongside a broader political narrative in which Canada’s leadership has frequently criticized U.S. policy decisions in ways that complicate bilateral messaging.

And that tension is the backdrop to this week’s cancellation.

If the White House did in fact raise concerns about Ford’s presence at a Chamber of Commerce event, it would signal something larger than a personal dispute. It would suggest that Canada’s internal political messaging—particularly from high-profile provincial and federal figures—is beginning to bleed into its diplomatic and business access channels in Washington.

That is not a trivial development.

Because regardless of how one interprets Ford’s political choices, the United States is still Canada’s single largest trade partner by a wide margin. Access to American business forums, policy-adjacent institutions like the Chamber of Commerce, and informal diplomatic spaces is a core component of how Canadian leaders influence cross-border outcomes. Losing or even temporarily losing that access carries consequences far beyond symbolism.

At the same time, it would be too simplistic to reduce this moment to a single cause-and-effect narrative. U.S. domestic politics is volatile, deeply factional, and highly sensitive to perceived foreign interference or criticism. A provincial premier walking into Washington during an election-aligned political climate—while tensions over trade, energy, and China policy remain unresolved—is inevitably going to be interpreted through multiple lenses at once.

And that brings us to the broader Canadian context.

Over the past year, Canada’s political class has leaned heavily into framing U.S. trade pressure and geopolitical competition in increasingly adversarial terms. Whether that is driven by electoral strategy, economic necessity, or public sentiment, it has created a messaging environment where diplomacy and political positioning often collide.

Critics argue this approach has led to unnecessary volatility. Supporters argue it reflects real external pressure and the need to protect Canadian interests. But either way, the outcome is the same: Canada’s relationship with its largest trading partner is now being managed not just in negotiation rooms, but in public political discourse.

That makes events like Ford’s cancelled reception more than just administrative footnotes. They become indicators of tone, trust, and political temperature.

And trust, once strained, is not easily rebuilt.

The irony here is that both sides of this equation claim to be pursuing stability. Ford has repeatedly emphasized investment certainty and integrated North American supply chains. American business leaders have consistently signaled interest in predictable cross-border policy environments. Yet the political signalling on both sides continues to introduce friction into precisely the system both claim to want to stabilize.

The reality is that this broader signal is hard to ignore: Canada’s internal political narratives are increasingly being noticed—and in some cases, resisted—at the highest levels of U.S. institutional engagement.

And that raises the real strategic question going forward.

Is Canada’s current approach to U.S. relations producing leverage—or producing friction that limits access to the very rooms where decisions get made? I think we know the answer to it.

Watch this morning’s full episode for more:

Well, fast forward to today, and every major polling firm in this country is suddenly documenting a brutal, unmitigated free fall for Prime Minister Mark Carney. And let’s be honest—we already know how heavily these mainstream sample pools skew in favour of the Liberals to begin with. If they are showing a collapse, the reality on the ground is likely worse.

Liaison: Carney Back to the Tracker Lows

The most damning data hit the wire yesterday from Liaison Strategies, and it documents a radical reality check for Fortress Carney. According to the latest figures, the Liberal lead has eroded to just eight points as Carney’s net approval rating plummets to match his all-time tracker low.

Do you know when he was last this low? December of last year, right when Canadians were starting to open their eyes and ask, “What in God’s name is going on? We elected this guy to manage Donald Trump and secure the U.S. relationship, and nothing is getting done.” Then, right on cue in January, he flies off to the World Economic Forum, delivers a slick Davos speech, and suddenly everyone falls back in love with the central banker. His popularity soared on simple words. The Davos high has officially shattered. Carney is right back in the gutter where he started.

Look at that net approval trajectory. Two months ago, Carney was sitting on a comfortable +31% net approval rating. Last month, it dropped to +20%. Today, it sits at +16%. He has bled 15 points of net approval in just 60 days. This is the direct consequence of everything we’ve been breaking down recently: cascading cracks in his own caucus, deeply unpopular policies, and a media apparatus that is occasionally forced to commit random acts of journalism. The Spring Economic Statement was a disaster. The “Sovereign Wealth Fund”—which we all know is just a glorified sovereign debt fund—went over like a lead balloon.

Now, Carney is trying to salvage his brand by cutting tiny rebate checks to Canadians, pumping them up on social media like he’s doing us a massive favour. But regular everyday people are looking at these checks with disdain

A Bold Prediction Validated

This polling collapse takes me back to a very specific post I made on May 19th of this year. It was a bold, audacious prediction, and the establishment laughed it off at the time. I wrote:

When I posted that, Steven Guilbeault hadn’t announced his resignation yet. Those 14 Liberal MPs hadn’t signed their names to an internal letter yet. None of the public chaos had materialized. I based that prediction purely on the structural rot of the Spring Economic Statement, the media was livid, and the fact that Gregor Robertson was quietly icing Carney out.

Now, the cracks are public record. Conservatives have been feeling demoralized, but these numbers prove we are well within a fighting chance to beat this government. The opportunity to apply pressure on this government is sitting right there on the table. Don’t check out. Get engaged.

The Humiliating “Fortress North America” Trade Pivot

As the July 1st CUSMA/USMCA revision deadline approaches, Ottawa is in an absolute panic. The Americans have effectively frozen Canada out of core trade talks while actively negotiating with Mexico. In response, the Liberal government has pulled off a breathtakingly embarrassing, hypocritical U.S. trade pivot.

The media is calling it a “Trumpian sales pitch.” For the last 18 months, Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford have acted as the chief anti-Trump cheerleaders in Canada, whining about tariffs and grandstanding about “defying Washington.” Ottawa’s official mantra was that Canada would simply bypass the U.S. by doubling non-American trade with Europe, Asia, and the Mercosur bloc.

But now that the rubber has met the road the Liberals have completely abandoned their defiance.

On Monday, Doug Ford is jetting down to Washington, D.C., to beg U.S. officials to accept a new concept called “Fortress North America.” Suddenly, the politicians who demonized regional integration are preaching the gospel of continental economic alignment. They went from claiming the U.S. was trying to “own us” to standing on Wall Street declaring that “a strong Canada will help Make America Great Again.” They wasted a year and a half stoking fear and anger for domestic political points instead of doing the actual work of leadership. They burned all of our geopolitical leverage, and now Canada is reduced to begging for scraps at the whims of the American administration.

The Charlie Angus Distraction Machine

Former NDP MP Charlie Angus—who stepped away from elected politics but is now desperately trying to maintain relevance through the Alex Soros, American-funded YouTube channel—resurfaced on Parliament Hill with a laughable proposal.

Angus publicly called on the newly appointed Foreign Interference Transparency Commissioner, Anton Bogman, to launch an official federal investigation into... the Alberta Independence Movement and the United States government.

Angus claimed that top U.S. State Department officials holding meetings with Alberta separatists constitutes a “Washington-led effort to destabilize Canada.” He then launched into a tirade against U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra for retweeting Donald Trump’s “51st State” comment, calling it an act of “foreign intimidation.”

Let’s expose the rank hypocrisy here. For years, Ottawa and Eastern Canada have treated Alberta like an atmospheric piggy bank, telling them their energy is “dirty” and their people are “backwoods hicks.” But the moment Alberta leaders sit down with American officials to explore their economic sovereignty options under an administration that actually supports energy development, the Laurentian elite throws a fit.

Furthermore, Charlie Angus has been completely silent on actual, proven foreign interference happening right in our backyard. On Friday, a Quebec court quietly postponed the economic espionage verdict for Yuesheng Wang—the former Hydro-Québec employee and Chinese national arrested in 2022 for funneling critical state utility secrets to Beijing under the Security of Information Act.

The elite are perfectly comfortable with Chinese state actors conducting corporate espionage and setting up illegal police stations to hunt down Chinese-Canadians on our soil. But a U.S. Ambassador reposts a post on social media, and suddenly Charlie Angus needs the help of the federal commissioner.

The simple truth is that the only people compromising Canadian sovereignty are the people running the government. If we had an administration that took national security seriously—one that actually kicked out the CCP, crushed the Mexican cartel drug networks at our borders, eradicated forced labor from our supply chains, and built up our national defence—we would have a position of absolute strength to negotiate with the Americans.

Instead, we have a government that runs away to Europe when the temperature gets hot. Mark Carney’s corporate experiment is failing, the timeline is accelerating, and the bill is coming due.

Watch the full episode here:

We always tell you to take polling data with a grain of salt. A poll is just a snapshot in time, often warped by the political leanings of the firms running the numbers. But when a trend line changes as drastically as this one did over the weekend, you have to lean in and pay attention.

Abacus Data just confirmed what Leger hinted at last week: Mark Carney’s political floor is giving way. Just one month ago, Carney was sitting on a relatively comfortable 29% approval rating in the Abacus tracking pools. Today? He has plummeted a staggering eight points down to 21%. His negative sentiment is up 4%, while his positive indicators have evaporated by 7%.

The real story isn’t just the drop; it’s where those voters are hiding. The “Neither Approve nor Disapprove” column has swelled to an unheard-of 16%. Normally, that fence-sitting category hovers around 8% on a high end. What this tells us is that Canadians are experiencing intense cognitive dissonance. They can see and feel the economic ruin around them, but they aren’t emotionally ready to throw the towel in on Carney just yet because they bought into the “central banker saviour” hype. They are parked in the “Neither” lot, waiting for the final push.

And look at the macro numbers tracking the direction of the country. A definitive 45% of Canadians now believe Canada is on the wrong track, compared to just 40% who say the right track.

When you ask Canadians what actually keeps them awake at night, the results completely destroy the PMO’s communication strategy:

• Rising Cost of Living: 66% (A massive, unifying supermajority)

• The Economy General: 39%

• Healthcare System Decay: 34%

• Housing Affordability: 33%

• Donald Trump: 32%

The Liberals have spent millions trying to make the entire country terrified of Trump. But regular Canadians don’t care about him; they care about how they’re going to survive.

The Semantic Gymnastics of the CBC

Because the numbers are so devastating, the state broadcaster had to pull out the big guns on Power & Politics with David Cochrane. The narrative they pushed out was pure gaslighting: Don’t believe your lying eyes, Canada. It’s not a real recession.

Suddenly, the legacy media is inventing brand-new qualifiers. It’s a “technical” recession, a “shallow” recession, a “temporary blip.” Let’s be clear: the term “technical recession” didn’t come from StatsCan. It was used by mainstream outlets to cushion Carney’s reputation.

To back up this narrative, Cochrane eagerly touted Friday’s jobs report, shouting from the rooftops that Canada added 88,000 jobs in May, dropping unemployment down to 6.6%. But let’s look at what those jobs actually are. Over 32,000 of those positions were temporary government hires for census data tracking, while another massive chunk consisted of short-term seasonal service jobs manufactured for the upcoming FIFA World Cup.

I know it’s not an exact 1-to-1 comparison due to the formulas they use, but it plays a huge role. It is an entirely artificial, government-juiced mirage designed to mask the fact that our organic, private-sector economy has been completely flatlining for the last two years.

The Pundit Class and the Art of Stat-Padding

Watching the CBC panel try to defend this mess was downright hilarious. They brought on “tribal conservative” Fred Delorey to wag his finger at Pierre Poilievre, claiming that screaming about a recession three years before an election is “dangerous politics.” Three years? Fred clearly isn’t watching the system fracture in real-time. This minority-majority coalition is on life support; this election is coming much sooner than three years, and you can quote me on that.

Then you have Kory Teneycke, fresh off managing a spectacular electoral collapse in British Columbia, lecturing the Conservatives on tone, claiming Poilievre looks like the “a-hole-in-chief.”

I love taking political advice from a guy who went into the BC election with a cushy lead optically with a star candidate like Caroline Elliott, massive backing, and a bottomless war chest, and still managed to lose to a grassroots candidate that was polling in the single digits just weeks prior.

The most damning indictment of Mark Carney’s leadership is his complete lack of skin in the game. We are less than three weeks away from the most critical CUSMA (USMCA) free trade review in our nation’s history. Sectoral tariffs are already gutting our industrial base, and the U.S. successfully investigated our supply chains under Section 301 and discovering the existence of forced labour.

So, where is our Prime Minister? Is he in Washington, D.C., working the phones and protecting Canadian workers?

No. He jetted off to France and Ireland to “deepen ties.”

Watch the full episode here:

Get more from Josh Udall in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

Read more